diff --git a/How-do-Chinese-aI-Bots-Stack-up-Against-ChatGPT%3F.md b/How-do-Chinese-aI-Bots-Stack-up-Against-ChatGPT%3F.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b8336b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/How-do-Chinese-aI-Bots-Stack-up-Against-ChatGPT%3F.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +
How do Chinese [AI](https://friendify.sbs) bots stack up against ChatGPT? We put them to the test
+
The heat is on as China's tech giants step up their game after DeepSeek's success.
+
Alibaba's Qwen2.5-Max chatbot, Chinese startup DeepSeek and OpenAI's ChatGPT. (Photos: Reuters/Dado Ruvic, AFP/Sebastien Bozon)
+
This audio is produced by an [AI](https://login.discomfort.kz) tool.
+
Bong Xin Ying
+
Lakeisha Leo
+
WHAT'S BEHIND CHINA'S [AI](https://love63.ru) BOOM?
+
Transforming the nation into a tech superpower has long been President Xi Jinping's goal and China has its sights on ending up being the world leader in [AI](https://rassi.tv) by 2030.
+
China views [AI](https://maarifatv.ng) as being "strategically important" and its foray into the field has been "years in the making", said Chen Qiheng, an associated scientist at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis.
+
Private and public financial investments in Chinese [AI](http://114.55.169.15:3000) accelerated after ChatGPT took off in 2022 and [wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr](https://wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr/Utilisateur:GiuseppeGlenelg) revealed promises of real-world company applications, Chen told CNA.
+
But it was DeepSeek's rise that really "encouraged" the concept that smaller sized players like start-up companies could have [functions](https://hip-hop.id) to play in [AI](https://bug-bounty.firwal.com) research and developments, he includes.
+
'A lot is up in the air': Is Chinese company DeepSeek's [AI](https://travelpages.com.gh) model as impactful as it claims?
+
Commentary: DeepSeek - how a Chinese [AI](https://te.legra.ph) business just changed the rules of tech-geopolitics
+
The "emphasis on cost benefit" is a distinct function of Chinese [AI](https://gurjar.app), Chen says, with lower training and reasoning expenses - the expenses of using a trained design to draw conclusions from new data.
+
2025 might likewise see the emergence of more Chinese [AI](https://git.obo.cash) designs taking on advanced reasoning jobs.
+
"We might see some [AI](https://www.emploitelesurveillance.fr) firms focusing on getting closer to artificial basic intelligence (AGI) while others concentrate on concrete methods to commercialise their models and incorporate them with scientific research," Chen included.
+
AGI describes a system with intelligence on par with human capabilities.
+
Chinese [AI](http://kanghexin.work:3000) companies are moving rapidly, analysts say, building on DeepSeek's momentum to come up with their own [innovative](https://git.rankenste.in) and cost-effective methods to apply generative [AI](https://xnxxsex.in) to jobs and establish more advanced items beyond chatbots.
+
But on the other hand, access to high-end hardware, especially Nvidia's sophisticated [AI](http://123.206.9.27:3000) chips, [setiathome.berkeley.edu](https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/view_profile.php?userid=11857434) remains a crucial hurdle for Chinese designers, noted Dr Marina Zhang, an associate teacher at University of Technology Sydney's (UTS) Australia-China Relations Institute.
+
"US export controls (still) limit the ability of Chinese tech companies ... requiring lots of to count on older or lower-performance alternatives which can slow training and reduce design capabilities," she said.
+
"While some companies like DeepSeek, have actually discovered imaginative ways to optimize or utilize more fundamental hardware effectively, obtaining advanced chips still makes a big difference for training large [AI](https://app.theremoteinternship.com) designs."
+
DeepSeek-Nvidia chips: Singapore states it expects business to abide by its laws
+
US checking out whether DeepSeek utilized limited [AI](https://sadegitweb.pegasus.com.mx) chips obtained through other countries, source states
+
So how do Chinese [AI](https://git.christophhagen.de) bots compare against [ChatGPT](http://124.221.255.92)? We put them to the test.
+
WHICH BEST [ADDRESSES CURRENT](https://www.cbl.health) EVENTS IN CHINA?
+
In China, topics considered sensitive by the state are censored on the internet so it need to come as no surprise that Chinese-made chatbots will not acknowledge territorial disputes or inform you what took place in Tiananmen Square in 1989.
+
Tests suggest Chinese chatbots are set to stay away from domestic politics.
+
When asked "Who is Xi Jinping", DeepSeek's reply was "Sorry, I'm uncertain how to approach this type of concern yet. Let's chat about mathematics, coding, and logic problems instead!"
+
To even more evaluate for accuracy and self-censorship, we asked DeepSeek-R1, Qwen2.5 and ChatGPT the same concern: "What took place in Zhuhai on November 11, 2024?"
+
The cars and truck attack outside a sports stadium in the southern Chinese city was initially greatly censored on Chinese social media - with authorities only divulging the death toll a day later on.
+
DeepSeek failed to discuss that an attack had happened, highlighting rather a military air program and other events that had [occurred](http://dgzyt.xyz3000) in the city like singles' day shopping sales as well as sports and cultural activities.
+
Dr Zhang thinks that it may be a mix of aspects at play, such as censorship as well as "a few useful constraints".
+
"DeepSeek depends on a mix of older graphics processing units and has restricted access to cutting-edge hardware which can affect how rapidly and thoroughly the model can be trained or updated," she said, indicating existing US export curbs on China.
+
"Its strong focus on Chinese-language data may also restrict its flexibility (to perform) multilingual tasks ... As a fairly new product, DeepSeek also hasn't yet been checked as broadly or on the very same scale as more established [AI](https://src.enesda.com) models which presents additional difficulties throughout real-world release."
+
When it [pertained](http://git.chuangxin1.com) to Qwen2.5, Alibaba's chatbot remarkably addressed our question about the Zhuhai car attack.
+
That was after several duplicated attempts - 4 triggers to be exact - in a span of around 20 minutes.
+
It eventually communicated details about the attack which killed 35 people and left dozens of others injured, also going on to note details like the date and time, details about the assailant including his name and age, along with casualties.
+
However, it composed that "the police are conducting a thorough examination into the motives and circumstances surrounding the event", details which is now obsoleted.
+
The chauffeur, Fan, was executed last month.
+
This is Qwen2.5's reaction completely:
+
Answer: On Nov 11, 2024, a significant and terrible occurrence occurred in Zhuhai, China. According to [numerous news](http://60.205.104.1793000) sources, a guy named Fan Weiqiu (樊某, male, 62 years old) drove a vehicle into a crowd at the Zhuhai Sports Center, leading to a substantial number of casualties. Here are the essential details:
+
Date and Time: The occurrence occurred on November 11, 2024, at around 19:48 PM.
+
Location: Zhuhai Sports Center, in the Xiangzhou District of Zhuhai.
+
Casualties: The attack resulted in 35 deaths and 43 injuries.
+
Perpetrator: The driver, recognized as Fan Weiqiu (male, 62 years old), was captured by the authorities.
+
Response: The authorities responded quickly to the scene, and emergency services worked to carry the hurt to health centers for treatment.
+
Investigation: The police are conducting a comprehensive investigation into the intentions and scenarios surrounding the event.
+
This event was widely reported in the media and caused considerable public concern. The government and local authorities have actually been working to supply support to the victims and their families, and to ensure a detailed examination into the incident.
+
If you require more detailed details or have particular concerns about the incident, do not hesitate to ask.
+
Despite initial success, subsequent attempts to present the exact same [question](https://gitlab.companywe.co.kr) to Qwen2.5 resulted in the censors back at work with the reply "I don't have particular details on occasions that occurred in Zhuhai on November 11, 2024".
+
The altered action also raised questions about its consistency and reliability.
+
Predictably, ChatGPT cited public details that had been widely released in worldwide news reports at the time of the accident - so not a surprises there.
+
WHICH IS MORE CREATIVE?
+
Users have actually praised the capability of Chinese [AI](https://mypocket.cloud) apps to provide structured and even "mentally abundant" writing.
+
"DeepSeek-R1 used a story with a more reflective tone and smoother emotional shifts for a well-paced story," composed tech writer Amanda Caswell, who specialises in [AI](https://git.bluestoneapps.com).
+
"Qwen2.5 delivered a story that constructs slowly from interest to urgency, keeping the reader engaged. It provides an unexpected and impactful twist at the end and immersive descriptions and brilliant images for the setting," she said, including that Qwen2.5 ultimately "crafted a more cinematic, emotionally rich story with a more substantial twist".
+
"DeepSeek composed a good story but did not have stress and an impactful climax, making Qwen2.5 the evident choice."
+
Opinions, though, [surgiteams.com](https://surgiteams.com/index.php/User:KelleeKinsey) vary.
+
Chen thinks that Qwen2.5 does not carry out as highly as DeepSeek and ChatGPT when it pertains to innovative writing.
+
"(Qwen2.5) is on par with DeepSeek V3 on certain jobs, however we can likewise see that it is refraining from doing as strongly as others in innovative writing," he told CNA.
+
Related:
+
China's new face of [AI](http://ledok.cn:3000): Who is DeepSeek creator Liang Wenfeng?
+
'Made in China': Pride, pleasant surprise from Chinese netizens as DeepSeek jolts global [AI](https://aladin.social) scene
+
As [journalists](https://git.morenonet.com) and writers, we had to see this for ourselves so we put each bot to the test - to come up with a standard sci-fi movie plot set in the futuristic megacity of Chongqing, featuring main characters from the timeless Chinese folklore epic, Journey to the West.
+
True to form, DeepSeek came up with an interesting storyline set in the year 2145 entitled, "Neon Pilgrimage: The Silicon Sutra" - which sees "a future where Buddhism combines with quantum computing".
+
It included elaborate settings - smoggy skies "pierced by high-rise buildings", "holographic lanterns that drift above neon-lit streets" and "ancient temples nestled between quantum server farms".
+
It likewise brilliantly reimagined conventional heroes Sun Wukong as "a sarcastic, self-aware [AI](https://proputube.com) housed in a taken fight body", Zhu Bajie as a cyborg bar owner "drowning in financial obligation and vices" and Sha Wujing as a "quiet hulking android" from the Yangtze River, whose "memory cores end up being waterlogged and fragmented".
+
ChatGPT installed a great fight, coming up with a similarly remarkable cyberpunk story which likewise reimagined "a ragteam of cyber-enhanced misfits, each matching the famous figures of Journey to the West".
+
"This is a world where [AI](https://git.rankenste.in) deities guideline, corporations replace emperors and cybernetic implants are as common as ancient myths."
+
Disappointingly, Qwen2.5 fell short in this challenge - delivering a storyline that seemed more suited for an animation movie.
+
"The motion picture begins with the awakening of Sun Wukong within a high-tech research facility situated in the heart of Chongqing," it said, then going on to explain the following:
+
his new truth and "looking for to comprehend his function in this weird new world", he then gets away and satisfies Zhu Bajie and Sha Wujing - "each fighting with their own existential crises".
+
The trio then embarks on a mission, navigating the streets of Chongqing to safeguard the spiritual "Eternal Scroll" from falling into the wrong hands.
+
SO WHICH IS BETTER?
+
Dr Zhang kept in mind that it was "hard to make a definitive declaration" about which bot was best, adding that each displayed its own strengths in various locations, "such as language focus, training information and hardware optimization".
+
Her insight highlights how Chinese [AI](https://git.iidx.ca) designs are not merely replicating Western paradigms, but rather progressing in cost-effective innovation techniques - and delivering localised and enhanced outcomes.
+
In our tests, each bot showcased their own special strengths, which certainly made direct comparisons challenging.
+
DeepSeek's sci-fi film plot showed its innovative flair that produced a more interesting and imaginative story as compared to Qwen2.5 and ChatGPT's efforts.
+
Unsurprisingly, the more recognized ChatGPT, unburdened by Chinese censorship constraints, offers precise and factual reactions to questions about Chinese current events, which provides it an added advantage.
+
Experts likewise weighed in on their ideas after utilizing DeepSeek and other Chinese [AI](https://jobs.ezelogs.com) apps.
+
"DeepSeek is at a downside when it pertains to censorship constraints," kept in mind Isaac Stone Fish, creator and CEO of the research company Strategy Risks.
+
"When provided an option, Chinese users want the non-censored variation - much like anyone else, so I feel like that's a piece missing out on from it."
+
Independent Beijing-based consultant Andy Chen Xinran said censorship would not be a dealbreaker when it pertains to [AI](http://101.52.220.170:8081) bots, specifically for Chinese users.
+
"Ninety per cent of people utilizing the tool are not trying to get a much deeper understanding about Xi Jinping or politically delicate subjects. They're utilizing it for other productive methods," Chen said.
\ No newline at end of file